laramie: (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] laramie at 10:15am on 01/04/2007
On the radio this morning there was a program during which the announcers quizzed a caller with a number of puzzles. These are the ones I remember:

If you had six white pigs, five black pigs and seven gray pigs, how many pigs could say that they were they same color as another pig?

A man walks out in pouring rain without a hat or an umbrella and does not get a single hair wet, though his clothes are soaked. How did he do it?

A train is approaching a man walking on the tracks; before jumping off the tracks he runs straight at the train for ten feet. Why?

A woman drops her expensive diamond ring into some coffee and it doesn’t get wet. Why?

A pet store owner tells a customer, "This parrot repeats everything he hears.” The customer buys the parrot but it never says a single word. The store owner was not lying. How do you explain this?

The caller got every question right.

1) Zero. Pigs can’t speak.
2.) The man is bald.
3.) He had to run ahead to get off a bridge.
4.) The coffee was dry grounds.
5.) The parrot was deaf.
There are 7 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] cakmpls.livejournal.com at 06:45pm on 01/04/2007
I got all of them, too.
 
posted by [identity profile] skylarker.livejournal.com at 07:50pm on 01/04/2007
I admire that. I got a couple, but mostly the lady on the radio was so fast that mostly the answers were out before I had the chance to figure them out for myself.
 
posted by [identity profile] cakmpls.livejournal.com at 08:05pm on 01/04/2007
I think this has something to do with my literal but nonlinear brain.
 
posted by [identity profile] skylarker.livejournal.com at 08:08pm on 01/04/2007
Yes; these types of puzzles appeal to the literalist in me, too. The answers are obvious once you think of them, but make good puzzles because people tend not to see the obvious, thinking first of preconceptions.
 
posted by [identity profile] don-fitch.livejournal.com at 09:07pm on 01/04/2007
I missed the first, giving the conditional "if... could say" too much metaphorical leeway. But for the others, I _did_ have to stop and think a moment. And even now I might quibble that "bald" doesn't necessary preclude the presence of eyebrows, eyelashes, or mustache or beard.
 
posted by [identity profile] skylarker.livejournal.com at 09:46pm on 01/04/2007
I think I misquoted the original question, which probably specified that the man didn't get a single hair 'on his head' wet. (Though, that does still leave room for eyebrows & mustache with loose interpretations of 'on') :)
 
posted by [identity profile] thorintatge.livejournal.com at 12:13am on 02/04/2007
I also got them all, but I've heard #2, #3, #5, and variants on #1 before, so they were no challenge. :) These puzzles are sometimes called 'lateral thinking' puzzles. I'm fond of them, but I like them to be mixed with a little traditional problem-solving skill as well. The 'aha' books by Martin Gardner are full of puzzles that strike just the right balance.

June

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30