laramie: (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] laramie at 09:40am on 10/04/2007
My Cross-posted comments from a discussion in another LJ

I've been in the middle of this issue in Mpls since the early 90s. I've never liked the way the Snotty Elitist Musicians tried to distance themselves from all things Filk, splitting Minneapolis into two separate camps of music that don't exist elsewhere in fandom.

I got stuck in the 'Filk' camp, partly* because I do like music about spaceships and aliens and I like putting alternate (related) lyrics to existing music - but that's never been the ONLY thing I like. I like a wide variety of music drawn from a wide variety of sources. (*And partly because I have not been as accomplished a performer as I am currently, and have never thought professionalism should count more than friendliness in this non-pro, community-based venue.)

I do think that there's something about filk (sf related) music that's special to fandom and should be respected for that if nothing else. It's the tradition of our tribe and ought to be preserved in face of the seductive influx of music from other cultures. So, for about six years I hosted a monthly filk circle and continue to attend them now that someone else is hosting.

And I was distressed when Minicon started scheduling Filk in rooms separate from the other music, and separate from the con suite areas where all the people, food and drink were to be found. And particularly distressed that none of the people doing the scheduling thought of consulting the filkers about what we wanted.

I'm torn on this issue. Because in my heart I'd love to see the musicians of this community take an 'All for One and One for All' stance - but I do see the practical difficulties of music parties that get too large for the available spaces, as well as taking too long to go 'round.

What I found at OVFF was a community that took the size problem in stride and planned for splitting into smaller circles when necessary. And planned on having a distribution of more accomplished and less accomplished performers in each circle, so that it didn't become a Cool vs Feeble Circle competitive atmosphere and things remained friendly all around.

I don't think filk should be separated out from general Music at minicon. I'd like to see one large or two smaller music areas side by side, open to whatever music all musicians concerned would enjoy playing and singing with each other.

At the Dessicated Dodo party last night I was talking with people running the next Minicon, and making the case for having the music right in the same area as the Con Suite. (It looks like the best bet is to take over the suite that Tor was using.) [livejournal.com profile] jiawen asked me if I want to be in charge of music for MiniCon 43, and I'm looking into what that would entail.
There are 35 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
ext_68560: (Default)
posted by [identity profile] davidwilford.livejournal.com at 03:36pm on 10/04/2007
FYI, I talked with Chas Somdahl (of Riverfolk) on Sunday and he told me he'd agreed to run music for Minicon 43. Rachel evidently doesn't know that either. You should talk with Keith and Matt about it to make sure though.

There has been a long-time conflict between the SEMP performance and open filking circle music camps at Minicon, but I'm pretty hesitant to say that elitist musicians shouldn't have an invitation-only scene if that's what they themselves want.
 
posted by [identity profile] cakmpls.livejournal.com at 03:45pm on 10/04/2007
I agree. To me, music--particularly performing it, but even just listening to it--is a fairly intimate experience. I can imagine wanting to have some control over whom one shares it with.
 
posted by [identity profile] joelrosenberg.livejournal.com at 04:04pm on 10/04/2007
Whether or not they should (and since I won't hang around listen to other than very quiet music that I'm not actively enjoying at a given moment, I'm not going to criticize others for doing the same), it's clear that they will, and that about all that the anti-private-music-party folks can do, in practice, is to force/motivate the private music parties to move further away from common spaces than they might otherwise do.
 
posted by [identity profile] skylarker.livejournal.com at 05:33pm on 10/04/2007
I'd characterize myself as more 'Pro Open Music' than anti anything. I respect the rights of others to throw and attend private parties. (What I like and what I respect can be two different things.)

I'd like to see the Minicon-sponsored music circles get the facilities and support needed to make for parties enjoyable for the musicians and listeners alike.
 
posted by [identity profile] joelrosenberg.livejournal.com at 05:42pm on 10/04/2007
Depending on what you mean by "facilities and support" -- and I don't mean to be Clintoneque here, pinky swear -- that's anywhere from a modest request that's likely to happen (and sounds like it didn't happen this year through a misunderstanding by/with the hotel -- I'm assuming that the originally planned venue was fine with you, although you know what they say about assumptions) to an impossibility.

I think you can get open music parties in a location that isn't metaphorically Siberia; I don't think you've got much of a chance of persuading people whose thing isn't open music parties to participate, either as audience or performers.
 
posted by [identity profile] skylarker.livejournal.com at 05:46pm on 10/04/2007
We did get some good music participation at an open circle on Saturday night, but it was located in the Edina room, far from anywhere else where there were people, food or drink. While it was well attended by musicians, there weren't that many people who found it as a place to come and listen and party.

That's what I mean by 'facilities.' And, after talking with Concom members at last night's Dessicated Dodo party, it does look like there's support for putting music closer to the general party area, and the ConSuite's refreshments.
 
posted by [identity profile] joelrosenberg.livejournal.com at 05:47pm on 10/04/2007
Orthogonally, he said, (with his head cocked to one side and a look of wry amusement on his lined face), maybe the the MnStf Board should establish a policy requiring those MnStf meeting hosts whose preference is for closed music circles to announce that in advance in Einblatt. . .

Nah. Probably not a good idea, all in all.
 
posted by [identity profile] skylarker.livejournal.com at 05:50pm on 10/04/2007
Nah. They would have to publish a list of which musicians were specifically invited - or most would assume that they weren't.
 
posted by [identity profile] joelrosenberg.livejournal.com at 05:57pm on 10/04/2007
I think I'd better admit defeat and surrender on this part of the discussion; you do deadpan better than I do.
 
posted by [identity profile] skylarker.livejournal.com at 06:00pm on 10/04/2007
A nod. Incidentally; how did you come across this post? It's open, but I didn't expect it to be read by anyone who doesn't have me on their Friend's List.
 
posted by [identity profile] joelrosenberg.livejournal.com at 06:14pm on 10/04/2007
http://community.livejournal.com/mnstf/friends -- orthogonally, I'm not sure who is on my own friends list . . .
 
posted by [identity profile] skylarker.livejournal.com at 07:23pm on 10/04/2007
Thanks. That looks like a good one to follow.
 
posted by [identity profile] skylarker.livejournal.com at 04:15pm on 10/04/2007
I can understand that, too. Though, it's not necessarily that clear cut a matter. [livejournal.com profile] markiv1111 said to me at the con, "I don't like having to choose between two sets of friends."

There are friendlier ways to handle the issue than has been done at MiniCon.

 
posted by [identity profile] skylarker.livejournal.com at 04:07pm on 10/04/2007
I guess Rachel hadn't heard that. Matt didn't mention it at last night's party. That's fine with me. I wouldn't know what to do besides talk to people.

I would never say that elitist musicians shouldn't have invitation only parties if that's what they want. But I do think the Open Circles should be set up to allow for a good experience for everyone interested.

I don't think invitational parties would be SO overwhelmingly attractive that everyone invited would obviously prefer them, if they didn't offer better features (food, drink, etc), and there were enough accomplished musicians ready to play in Open circles with comparable features.

The problem seems to arise when ALL the accomplished performers disappear into a private space leaving a few less skilled performers alone in a bare room far from the party spaces and far from refreshments.
jiawen: NGC1300 barred spiral galaxy, in a crop that vaguely resembles the letter 'R' (Default)
posted by [personal profile] jiawen at 08:13pm on 10/04/2007
As I said, though: "I can't offer you the job, since it's not mine to offer, but you should talk to Keith or Matt and let them know if you're interested." I never offered you the position. Please don't make it sound like I did!

I saw a lot of in-group/out-group stuff going on at the con. Bleah.
 
posted by [identity profile] skylarker.livejournal.com at 08:38pm on 10/04/2007
Sorry if I mis-spoke about it. I don't remember exactly what was said, just the suggestion that I do something like that. I've followed up everywhere I mentioned the subject to say that Chas will be doing the job anyhow.
 
posted by [identity profile] mia-mcdavid.livejournal.com at 05:18pm on 10/04/2007
There has been a long-time conflict between the SEMP performance and open filking circle music camps at Minicon, but I'm pretty hesitant to say that elitist musicians shouldn't have an invitation-only scene if that's what they themselves want.

Obviously, they can do anything they want. They could also have private parties in their homes. But, when people who say "Oh, I'm not a snobby musician" then cut their non-cool friends to go to those private parties, they perpetuate the problem. The snobby party ends up sucking *all* the best musicians out of public space.

It just makes me so sad, and the rate things are going, I'm never going to get to an out-of-town convention again . . .
 
posted by [identity profile] skylarker.livejournal.com at 05:24pm on 10/04/2007
It would be nice if musicians all said, "'Its one for all and all for one' among us, and I don't want to go to your invitational party if I can't bring my friends." And I think the cool parties would be anywhere that such people chose to play.

But I wouldn't ask that of anyone to whom it doesn't come naturally and from the heart.
 
posted by [identity profile] cakmpls.livejournal.com at 03:42pm on 10/04/2007
I absolutely HATE having music in the consuite, or adjacent to it so that the music is clearly heard in the consuite. I don't always want to hear music, and I particularly don't want to hear music--as anything other than the faintest of backgrounds--when I'm trying to have conversations with people.

Please consider that many of us who regularly attend Minicon are reaching the age at which it is common to have problems hearing a converstaion when there is a lot of ambient noise--which is exactly what music is in such a situation.
 
posted by [identity profile] skylarker.livejournal.com at 04:16pm on 10/04/2007
When this came up at the Dessicated Dodo party it was pretty much agreed that the nearest usable space for music would be on the first floor, under the Con Suite. I don't think that interfered with conversations above.
 
Music on the first floor room definitely did not interfere with conversation on the 2nd floor. Even when the music party below was in full swing, packed to the rafters with loud guitars, you couldn't hear it at all in the 2nd floor consuite. Well, I couldn't, anyway. If you were standing out by the balcony on the second floor you could hear that music was going on below, but very faintly.

 
Good. That was my impression, too. We even got a small filk circle going in the bar for a while, and I don't think that could be heard in the Con Suite, or even by the poker players on the patio - once they closed the door. :)
 
I will agree that *I* couldn't hear the music party from the consuite, unless I stopped directly above the music party on the balcony and *really*listened* for it.

However, my hearing loss means that the standard volume-as-inverse-square rule is more like an inverse-cube rule, so take my evaluation with a heavy grain of salt.
 
posted by [identity profile] lavenderbard.livejournal.com at 06:25pm on 10/04/2007
Because of the private party thingy, I never actually met any of the infamous music snobs of Minicon. :shrug: I don't worry that I missed much. I'm quite certain I'd far rather hang out with you. :)

Good luck in trying to make the open filking more fun, and if there is anything I can do to help from over here in OVFF territory, please let me know.

Just for the record, Marcon, which would be a better equivalent to Minicon than OVFF, has a complete filk programming track that also arranges for circle splitting and seeds circles with skilled performers and so forth. They have one dedicated filk room during the day, in which they run concerts and filk related panels, and then they take over rooms from other programming tracks in the evening, when the other tracks shut down. Usually one room is an openfilk with a host, and the other room is usually a themed circle, also with a host, and there's a third overflow room available if anyone wants it. The circle hosts are treated like panelists. They have volunteered, and are scheduled for a certain block of time, and then either they get relieved by the next host, or if its late the circle goes hostless in the assumption that it will have built up its own momentum by then. They also get volunteer credit and access to the green room and so forth, as do the people doing concerts and filk panels and so forth during the day.

The filking is NOT by the consuite. But then none of the programming is by the consuite at Marcon, the consuite is heck and gone in the other direction, and I've never actually *been* there. I think what you want is a location that it is enough out of the way that those who don't want to listen don't feel like they can't get away, and yet close enough to the main thouroughfair that people can find it easily, and even, occasionally by accident. :) At Marcon that means the last room of a dead end hallway with seven other programming rooms in it. Anyone hitting any one of those rooms during the hours of regular programming would be aware of the occasional bit of music creeping out from the last room in that hallway, but it's enough out of the way that it doesn't inconvenience anyone.

Finding enough space is rarely an issue with filking because most filking happens after the other programming shuts down. Finding the right space *is*. You don't want to be next to the movie room or the ballroom or any guest rooms. The *most* important thing however, is that where ever you decide to be, you let the hotel know that it will be used for music programming and will be creating noise all night. Get them to agree, and get that agreement in writing and signed. Otherwise any one intolerant idiot who enjoys complaining can get you shut down just for the thrill that kind of attention gets him.

There is a story of the hotel trying to shut down the filking at OVFF. Hotels will obviously *try* anything ::rolling eyes:: It didn't work, of course. OVFF had a contract, and the contract said it was a music convention and that they had access to the programming space all night, and the police told the hotel "this is *your* problem", and walked out. But there are lots of other stories of filkers being promised space and the hotel weaselling out. Always get it in writing.
 
posted by [identity profile] skylarker.livejournal.com at 07:35pm on 10/04/2007
But there are lots of other stories of filkers being promised space and the hotel weaselling out. Always get it in writing.

Thanks for the tip! And the thoughtful post. It seems strange to me that Minneapolis finds it so hard to handle this issue in a such sensible ways as we see other cons do. Probably has something to do with the people concerned failing to come together long enough to discuss the matter, or lack of unbiased moderators to help that process along.
 
posted by [identity profile] lakeboy-55.livejournal.com at 09:20pm on 10/04/2007
At the risk of alienating friends and non-friends alike I'm going to jump in here. As a musician, even one as peripheral as I am, who is not a filker, sitting through some of the long and multitudinous verses of clever and not-so-clever filk songs can be very difficult. I do like filk music in general, although I don't play it or write it. However, I do like playing music in the circle. I don't think I would favor a combined filk and "mainstream" music party. I'm not advocating "separate but equal" either. I think that what filkers want out of a music circle may be different from what other musicians want out of a circle, in the same way that a musician who does nothing but covers of songs might not be appropriate in a circle of musicians whose interest is in sharing original material.

I know that I am treading on thin ice here, and I certainly don't mean to imply that filk is any less valid or creative than any other form of musical expression, it is certainly more creative than some. I'm just saying that, as someone who does not have a passion for filking, it would be less enjoyable to me to have to wait a turn to play in a large circle where people were playing music that might not interest me, or that might be very long and involved. I have been in some of the circles, both mixed and SEMP (if that is what I think it is) that were huge, where it took an hour for a turn to come around, where some people just didn't really "get" the dynamics of the circle, and it was very painful to sit through.

With all of that pussy-footing around, I guess what I would like is to see filk on an equal footing with non-filk circles, not cast in competition with each other and not forced to cohabitate either. In an ideal convention/party world, the mainstream music circle and the filk circles wouldn't be going at the same time, and both would be put in comfortable and accessible and open venues. That way people who wanted to participate in both could have the opportunity, and those who weren't interested in one or the other wouldn't have to endure something that they didn't enjoy.

I truly hope I haven't offended anyone here. So many of my friends are in one camp or the other, and some of them are in both camps. Sigh...it's so complicated.
 
posted by [identity profile] skylarker.livejournal.com at 10:19pm on 10/04/2007
As someone who enjoys both types of music I'm certainly not offended by your expressing your preferences. In fact, thank you; I really want to hear how people feel about this from various perspectives.

Although I prefer a mixed circle, I do like the idea of having room for several circles with different styles if that's what the musicians involved prefer. At some cons, as ladylavender was saying above, they do this, and even specify particular themes for some circles.

I don't enjoy equally every song that comes up, regardless of what kind of circle it is. There's always going to be something that seems tedious compared to my personal favorites. And there are darn few performers with whom I couldn't find some fault if they asked for a critique. But I tend to think it's worthwhile to sit through some things I don't like as much, in order to have a circle where more people feel welcome.

The circles aren't just about music to me, they are about hearing what comes from the hearts and souls of the members of my community. And if I liked every performance as much as I like my favorites I'd never be able to tear myself away from the circle long enough to visit the bathroom. And that would be trouble. :)
 
posted by [identity profile] markbernstein.livejournal.com at 07:10pm on 11/04/2007
Hi, just dropped in thanks to a pointer from [livejournal.com profile] markiv1111. I'm a long-time, active filker in Michigan. I do know who the SEMP people are, but have only ever been to one of their parties, many years ago.

I'd say you put your view very diplomatically. And I would completely agree that ". . what filkers want out of a music circle may be different from what other musicians want out of a circle". One of the primary values of the filk community these days, at least at the cons I go to, is to encourage everyone to express themselves. In the short term, that does lead to some performances that range from less-than-professional to not-very-good-at-all. In the long term, I find it leads to a lot of people getting better at it with time, which I regard as, well, joyous. For more, take a look at this link (http://www.filking.net/filkfaq/what-is-the-filk-community), where a number of people, including me, talk about what the filk community means to them.

I don't bear any personal animus against the "snobby elitists". They're just a bunch of long time friends, who like to get together and make music with each other, and keep control of who they invite to their parties. And I certainly don't think any less of Nate for attending - they're his long time friends too. (If the Tor Books party was a SEMP party, that probably just means it was being run by Patrick and Teresa, who are both editors at Tor, and part of that circle of friends.)

Questions, from someone who's never been to Minicon: Does the SEMP party take place in a hotel room, or a function room? If it's a hotel room (which I suspect, given usual hotel policies on outside food in function spaces), who's paying for the room, and who's paying for the food and drink? If it's the people throwing the party, then they have the right to handle things as they see fit. If it's the con, well, I would object on principle to part of my membership money going to any purpose that's not available to all members.

Most of the filk circles I go to are in function rooms, and as such aren't allowed to bring in non-hotel food and drink. Getting a room that's closer to the con suite may well be possible, depending on hotel layout. Getting facilities equal to those of a private party probably isn't. Nonetheless, if I ever make it to Minicon, the open filk is where you'd find me.
 
posted by [identity profile] skylarker.livejournal.com at 07:30pm on 11/04/2007
The Tor party was indeed a private party, privately funded.

The problem that some of us had with it, was that almost every musician who attended the open music circles was invited, so that the few who were not invited were left on our own with no alternate circle to attend.

I got together with a couple friends and we made some music in our small way - but it was nothing like the fun of getting a larger circle together. The effect was, as Nate pointed out, more 'outvitational' than invitational, and, while I consider it a waste of energy to harbor resentments, some people felt very hurt.
ext_68560: (Default)
posted by [identity profile] davidwilford.livejournal.com at 11:42pm on 11/04/2007
The _music_ was available to all con members; the invite to play in the circle wasn't.

I don't have a problem with invite-only circles, no more than I have a problem with individuals or select groups of musicians scheduling a performance in con space which by definition is limited by the number of time slots that are available. I would have a problem if that monopolized the music entirely though, or forced other filkers to play off in some isolated spot somewhere.
 
posted by [identity profile] catalana.livejournal.com at 04:50pm on 12/04/2007
In that case, what you have is a performer's circle, which is recognized in filk; I just haven't seen too many of them occur at night. Interesting.

(I have no ties to Minneapolis, so I'm just an interested observer here.)
 
posted by [identity profile] mjlayman.livejournal.com at 10:16pm on 14/04/2007
I was looking for [livejournal.com profile] skylarker's LJ name for my Thursday con report and came upon this thread. I know the SEMPs and they know me, but my problem with them is that they don't consider singers to be musicians. If you have an instrument, but play badly (as was true in the Friday party), you can be in the circle. If you're a professional trained musician but sing, you can't be in the circle, or at least only until another instrumentalist shows up. I don't see any use in singing outside the circle because it's not really participating -- you don't really hear the intricacies of the music.

That wasn't why I skipped the Tor party, though. My ankles were +4 pitting edema by then so I spent Sunday night in bed with my feet up on pillows.
 
posted by [identity profile] skylarker.livejournal.com at 11:24pm on 14/04/2007
I've known a capella singers to join the Open Music. And even be well received, though it's hard for instrumentalists to join in with them, other than simple percussion. There've been some very lovely opportunities for vocal harmony, though. (I always enjoy it when [livejournal.com profile] mplsfish sings LCohen's Hallelujah.)

I'm sorry to hear about the trouble with your ankles. I got a small open circle going in the bar for a while on Sunday, and another singer would have been welcome.
 
posted by [identity profile] mjlayman.livejournal.com at 11:32pm on 14/04/2007
I have the curse of perfect pitch, so I could sing and instruments follow, but usually I sing an instrumental part. Sometimes harmony, if it's right for a piece, but usually something like a clarinet or trumpet part that would be there if the piece was orchestrated. I have enough lung now to sing, maybe I should rent some wind instruments and see if I have enough for them.

The ankles are always bad when I sit up straight for most of the day. At home, I use the recliner most of the time.
 
posted by [identity profile] skylarker.livejournal.com at 12:10am on 15/04/2007
I meant that not all the local instrumentalists are so expert that they can tell what key a singer is in and play unfamiliar material by ear. There are some who could do it, but they might hesitate without a specific invitation to try it.

June

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30