ext_68560: (Default)
posted by [identity profile] davidwilford.livejournal.com at 03:36pm on 10/04/2007
FYI, I talked with Chas Somdahl (of Riverfolk) on Sunday and he told me he'd agreed to run music for Minicon 43. Rachel evidently doesn't know that either. You should talk with Keith and Matt about it to make sure though.

There has been a long-time conflict between the SEMP performance and open filking circle music camps at Minicon, but I'm pretty hesitant to say that elitist musicians shouldn't have an invitation-only scene if that's what they themselves want.
 
posted by [identity profile] cakmpls.livejournal.com at 03:45pm on 10/04/2007
I agree. To me, music--particularly performing it, but even just listening to it--is a fairly intimate experience. I can imagine wanting to have some control over whom one shares it with.
 
posted by [identity profile] joelrosenberg.livejournal.com at 04:04pm on 10/04/2007
Whether or not they should (and since I won't hang around listen to other than very quiet music that I'm not actively enjoying at a given moment, I'm not going to criticize others for doing the same), it's clear that they will, and that about all that the anti-private-music-party folks can do, in practice, is to force/motivate the private music parties to move further away from common spaces than they might otherwise do.
 
posted by [identity profile] skylarker.livejournal.com at 05:33pm on 10/04/2007
I'd characterize myself as more 'Pro Open Music' than anti anything. I respect the rights of others to throw and attend private parties. (What I like and what I respect can be two different things.)

I'd like to see the Minicon-sponsored music circles get the facilities and support needed to make for parties enjoyable for the musicians and listeners alike.
 
posted by [identity profile] joelrosenberg.livejournal.com at 05:42pm on 10/04/2007
Depending on what you mean by "facilities and support" -- and I don't mean to be Clintoneque here, pinky swear -- that's anywhere from a modest request that's likely to happen (and sounds like it didn't happen this year through a misunderstanding by/with the hotel -- I'm assuming that the originally planned venue was fine with you, although you know what they say about assumptions) to an impossibility.

I think you can get open music parties in a location that isn't metaphorically Siberia; I don't think you've got much of a chance of persuading people whose thing isn't open music parties to participate, either as audience or performers.
 
posted by [identity profile] skylarker.livejournal.com at 05:46pm on 10/04/2007
We did get some good music participation at an open circle on Saturday night, but it was located in the Edina room, far from anywhere else where there were people, food or drink. While it was well attended by musicians, there weren't that many people who found it as a place to come and listen and party.

That's what I mean by 'facilities.' And, after talking with Concom members at last night's Dessicated Dodo party, it does look like there's support for putting music closer to the general party area, and the ConSuite's refreshments.
 
posted by [identity profile] joelrosenberg.livejournal.com at 05:47pm on 10/04/2007
Orthogonally, he said, (with his head cocked to one side and a look of wry amusement on his lined face), maybe the the MnStf Board should establish a policy requiring those MnStf meeting hosts whose preference is for closed music circles to announce that in advance in Einblatt. . .

Nah. Probably not a good idea, all in all.
 
posted by [identity profile] skylarker.livejournal.com at 05:50pm on 10/04/2007
Nah. They would have to publish a list of which musicians were specifically invited - or most would assume that they weren't.
 
posted by [identity profile] joelrosenberg.livejournal.com at 05:57pm on 10/04/2007
I think I'd better admit defeat and surrender on this part of the discussion; you do deadpan better than I do.
 
posted by [identity profile] skylarker.livejournal.com at 06:00pm on 10/04/2007
A nod. Incidentally; how did you come across this post? It's open, but I didn't expect it to be read by anyone who doesn't have me on their Friend's List.
 
posted by [identity profile] joelrosenberg.livejournal.com at 06:14pm on 10/04/2007
http://community.livejournal.com/mnstf/friends -- orthogonally, I'm not sure who is on my own friends list . . .
 
posted by [identity profile] skylarker.livejournal.com at 07:23pm on 10/04/2007
Thanks. That looks like a good one to follow.
 
posted by [identity profile] skylarker.livejournal.com at 04:15pm on 10/04/2007
I can understand that, too. Though, it's not necessarily that clear cut a matter. [livejournal.com profile] markiv1111 said to me at the con, "I don't like having to choose between two sets of friends."

There are friendlier ways to handle the issue than has been done at MiniCon.

 
posted by [identity profile] skylarker.livejournal.com at 04:07pm on 10/04/2007
I guess Rachel hadn't heard that. Matt didn't mention it at last night's party. That's fine with me. I wouldn't know what to do besides talk to people.

I would never say that elitist musicians shouldn't have invitation only parties if that's what they want. But I do think the Open Circles should be set up to allow for a good experience for everyone interested.

I don't think invitational parties would be SO overwhelmingly attractive that everyone invited would obviously prefer them, if they didn't offer better features (food, drink, etc), and there were enough accomplished musicians ready to play in Open circles with comparable features.

The problem seems to arise when ALL the accomplished performers disappear into a private space leaving a few less skilled performers alone in a bare room far from the party spaces and far from refreshments.
jiawen: NGC1300 barred spiral galaxy, in a crop that vaguely resembles the letter 'R' (Default)
posted by [personal profile] jiawen at 08:13pm on 10/04/2007
As I said, though: "I can't offer you the job, since it's not mine to offer, but you should talk to Keith or Matt and let them know if you're interested." I never offered you the position. Please don't make it sound like I did!

I saw a lot of in-group/out-group stuff going on at the con. Bleah.
 
posted by [identity profile] skylarker.livejournal.com at 08:38pm on 10/04/2007
Sorry if I mis-spoke about it. I don't remember exactly what was said, just the suggestion that I do something like that. I've followed up everywhere I mentioned the subject to say that Chas will be doing the job anyhow.
 
posted by [identity profile] mia-mcdavid.livejournal.com at 05:18pm on 10/04/2007
There has been a long-time conflict between the SEMP performance and open filking circle music camps at Minicon, but I'm pretty hesitant to say that elitist musicians shouldn't have an invitation-only scene if that's what they themselves want.

Obviously, they can do anything they want. They could also have private parties in their homes. But, when people who say "Oh, I'm not a snobby musician" then cut their non-cool friends to go to those private parties, they perpetuate the problem. The snobby party ends up sucking *all* the best musicians out of public space.

It just makes me so sad, and the rate things are going, I'm never going to get to an out-of-town convention again . . .
 
posted by [identity profile] skylarker.livejournal.com at 05:24pm on 10/04/2007
It would be nice if musicians all said, "'Its one for all and all for one' among us, and I don't want to go to your invitational party if I can't bring my friends." And I think the cool parties would be anywhere that such people chose to play.

But I wouldn't ask that of anyone to whom it doesn't come naturally and from the heart.

June

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30